Today’s article is to visit the pros and cons on going for IPO/listing
As financial executives, we are aware of the following obvious advantages of taking a private company into a public listed status:

• Enhances profile and standing of the company;
• Access to capital market;
• Flexibility in sourcing funds;
• Ability to get cheaper funding due to public listed status;
• Greater visibility;
• Added value to share by increasing its marketability;
• Compliance with NDP

However, we are also seeing a growing trend of public listed companies contemplating to bring their companies or subsidiaries back to private status. [refer to article on company going private]
Hence, the message is clear: financial executives needs to further consider the following factors when intending to go for IPO:

• Is the company able to withstand constant public scrutiny from the public;
• The responsibility towards public accountability as the investing parties are outsiders;
• Family controlled companies seriously might need to consider the dilution of their shareholding or control;
• The constant need to comply with strict legislation for example the announcement of sensitive matters, insider trading, complying with the time line on financial reporting;
• Review the cost of listing and “costs” of keeping good corporate governance.

Not forgetting that there have real life situation where after attaining public listed status, management find themselves no longer fanciful of the public listed status simply for the following reasons:

• When their companies were listed, it was in a robust share market environment but subsequently after that, when gloomy market situation prevails, their company‘s share prices have been grossly under-valued by the public/share market;
• The management is unable to take the onerous corporate governance and disclosure requirements;
• The initial objective of listing no longer provide any tangible benefits;
• To avoid assets strippers/predators who seeks the opportunities in public listed companies where their share prices are below their net tangible assets (particularly in property development and stock broking businesses);
• High cost of maintaining those onerous corporate governance and disclosure requirements

If you found this post useful, keep updated with future posts by subscribing to FMAccounting (for free) through RSS or email.

Related Entries

• Privatisation: From Listed To Private
• Do You Meet The Criteria For IPO In Malaysia?
• Exploring IPO In Vietnam
• Malaysia: Bursa Securities (KLSE) Amends Rules on Bonus Issues
• Malaysia IPO Statistics In Q3’2007