M&A: What is the difference between a merger and a takeover?
Both Merger or Acquisition shares the same goal namely  to combine two previously separate firms into a single legal entity so as to reap economies of scales and other synergies ultimately leading to the enhancement of shareholder value in the long term..
For a merger:
- It  normally involves two relatively equal companies, which combine to become one legal entity
- In a merger of two corporations, the shareholders usually have their shares in the old company exchanged for an equal number of shares in the merged entity.
- A merger normally requires mutual decision amongst the two parties.
However, compared to a merger, a takeover, or acquisition is characterized by the following:
·        There is no mutual decision amongst the two parties
·        Normally the purchase of a smaller company is by a much larger one. The larger company normally initiates a hostile takeover which meets with resistance from the smaller company’s management.
in an acquisition, the acquiring firm usually offers a cash price per share to the target firm’s shareholders or the acquiring firm’s share’s to the shareholders of the target firm according to a specified conversion ratio. Either way, the purchasing company essentially finances the purchase of the target company, buying it outright for its shareholders.
- Japanese banker Caught In Dilemma Over Proposed Takeover Of Hokuetsu By Oji Paper
- M&A Way To Grow Bigger And Stronger
- Mergers & Acquisitions: Potential Takeover Target
- Nippon Paper Entering The Takeover Battle Between Aggressor Oji Paper And Hokuetsu
- An Example Of Merger Between Two Communication Giants: Nokia And Siemens
- Definitions & Rationale for M&A: Introduction
- Rights Issue: Understanding Its Purpose, Mechanism & Difference Between Bonus Issue
April 12, 2006
Posted in: M&As
Leave a Reply