Both Merger or Acquisition shares the same goal namely  to combine two previously separate firms into a single legal entity so as to reap economies of scales and other synergies ultimately leading to the enhancement of shareholder value in the long term..

For a merger:

• It  normally involves two relatively equal companies, which combine to become one legal entity

• In a merger of two corporations, the shareholders usually have their shares in the old company exchanged for an equal number of shares in the merged entity.

• A merger normally requires mutual decision amongst the two parties.

However, compared to a merger, a takeover, or acquisition is characterized by the following:
·         There is no mutual decision amongst the two parties
·         Normally the purchase of a smaller company is by a much larger one. The larger company normally initiates a hostile takeover which meets with resistance from the smaller company’s management.
in an acquisition, the acquiring firm usually offers a cash price per share to the target firm’s shareholders or the acquiring firm’s share’s to the shareholders of the target firm according to a specified conversion ratio. Either way, the purchasing company essentially finances the purchase of the target company, buying it outright for its shareholders.

If you found this post useful, keep updated with future posts by subscribing to FMAccounting (for free) through RSS or email.

Related Entries

• M&A Way To Grow Bigger And Stronger
• Japanese banker Caught In Dilemma Over Proposed Takeover Of Hokuetsu By Oji Paper
• “New” M&A Rules From China
• M&A Lessons Learned From Cisco Systems
• Pre-offer & Post-offer Defenses