Understanding the infamous “Romalpa case”will further assist us to tighten our terms and conditions. If we recalled,the Romalpa case relates to the reservation of title clause.
It either states:
Clause 1:Ownership to the goods does not pass until the goods are paid for,or
Clause 2:Ownership to the goods does not pass until all monies due to the supplier have been paid.
For Clause 1,it is essential that the goods supplied can be separately identified. Hence,it will be necessary specifically to identify goods with unpaid invoices. This usually means some form of batch or serial number on the goods which matches with the same number on the invoice.
If Clause 2 above is used,any identifiable goods may be reclaimable.
Always consult your solicitor on the suitability of using this Romalpa case in relation to the nature of your company business.
- Credit Management:Proper Documentation
- ALL TOPICS COVERED UNDER THE HEADING-CREDIT MANAGEMENT/CREDIT CONTROL
- Salient Features of a Good Credit Policy and Procedures Manual
- Negative Pledge Clause
- What Are The Roles/Function Of Credit Management Department
- Credit Management:What is the KPA and KPI of a Credit Manager?
- Credit Management:A Brief Description of Litigation Or Legal Process &Workflow

FCCA,CA(MIA)with more than 26 years of post-qualifying working experiences. Previous working stints with one of the big accounting four,Regional GFC & Group Treasurer in a group of Malaysian and Group CFO in Singapore public listed concern.Also author to another very popular free educational accounting cum finance blog:http://basiccollegeaccounting.com under the branding of College Accounting Coach.
Recent Comments